Yep. Huge win for one of the Adelaide clubs.
1 Like
If heās a **** there is no downside here! Bring me the mongrel
Have to be the crows wouldnāt it? Unless port trade their first for him I guess.
I rekon Port would trade their FRP for this guy
1 Like
SYD Dawson and pick 12 to
ADEL for pick 4 and pick 23
the first rounders will probably go back 2 spots each because of Darcy and Daicos bids.
Does that look right?
Heās my favourite already
Mentioned a fair while ago that Port are heavily into him.
1 Like
Competition for spots will drive standards. With Kelly onboard Gleeson wonāt be on our list next year. Brand is no where near ready to play AFL so that leaves our defense at Stewart, Laverde, Ridley, Reid, Francis (might be trade fodderā¦who knows) as the talls and Redman, Hind, Heppell, Cutler and Kelly as the smaller defenders. Have I missed anyone (genuine question)? I think having a pool of 10-11 defenders into 6 spots looks like good depth.
Port have been into him for a while and have already invested time into picking him up. Iād be staggered if he didnāt end up there
2 Likes
We have backmen his size coming out of our backsides. But theyāre largely interceptors or rebounders. If his big selling point is that heās a defender, as in, someone who primarily defends, then he could definitely have a niche.
1 Like
I would like to see Redman push up the ground more in games, if Kelly can free that up its wins all round. Having players like Hind and Redman freed up to be damaging further up the ground without sacrificing the defensive side of the game is a massive need.
Yay no Gleeson 
Now Langford is my official whipping boy
This is how Iām reading it.
This topic was automatically closed after reaching the maximum limit of 10000 replies. Continue discussion at 2021 trade spec (Part 4).