It was a good game, not saying itās not. But in modern football, rebound counts, and as a result Hartleyās position is always going to have a ? Mark.
Better players than Hartley have never kept Franklin goalless. I know he had 6 shots on goal but still, itās telling where the shots were taken from.
He is in decent form and Iām rapt with him.
One thing from last night, when BJ played on and got smothered, why canāt take Harts take the kick? Clearly we want to get the ball as far away as possible hence the play on, but with Hartleyās ability to roost it, he wouldnāt have needed to kick to himself. And frankly Hartley doesnāt offer a marking option and in fact Beej is much better in the air. I just think we are far too predictable at kick outs and so Hartley might provide a different option?
Iām sure the counter argument is that he was there to punch the ball out of bounds if necessary , but I reckon itās worth a try
Until last night Buddy had played against us 13 times. 10 with the Hawks and 3 with the Swans. In that time, he kicked 64 goals and 27 behinds, an average of 4.9 goals a game.
Last night was a massive win for Harts, if you fail to recognise that, you know nothing about footy.
Harts had a good game. Buddy was pretty ineffectual for most of the game.
But make no mistake, Buddy was very important for them in that last 5 minutes. He took a couple of marks and sets up a a few plays that ended up with them scoring.
Did you watch the game? How many of those shots were cheap handballs from someone elses work for a ping outside 50. At least 3 if I remember. He was beaten.
Huh? Iāve already said I thought Hartley played well. But Franklin is one of the best KP players in the league, and downplaying his influence is ridiculous. He wa the most influential KP forward on the ground, and we were damn lucky he missed so many (and of course they should say the same for Raz and Green). I think Hartley played well to keep him to that.
But letās not ignore reality when rating players.