My mail is she was not doing so well at her job and other staff told her what they thought. No idea if was warranted but Marles told her to step up or find another job. He could have sacked her, no idea why he didn’t. In my experience he is a prikk of a guy.
Don’t know if you have worked in Parliament House, I did a very long time ago, and there were lots of very precious people then. My visits since have not changed that view.
That said MPs have unreasonably high requirements from their staff, who are mostly treated as slaves. Even the good MPs expectations are over the top at times and the pressure is very high to perform.
Marles Chief of Staff probably earns $450,000 so it is a nice little earner.
Sure they should be addressed and called out. But this is such a meek, uneventful run of the mill workplace issue that it deserves absolutely no air time. This is the type of ■■■■ that should get resolved by a mature discussion between the two parties.
The shitstorm this will unnecessarily create will chew up resources that could be much better spent elsewhere.
I’m surprised that a COS didn’t think she held the hose on sorting out bullying within the staff, but pushed it up the line to the Minister to sort out.
I believe pollies have thoughtfully given themselves and their offices an exemption to a wide range of workplace laws, unfair dismissal may be one of them.
Pollies will be likely earning more than the high income threshold. Once you hit that limit, by law you are not entitled to make an unfair dismissal claim.
The Guardian article, quoting her, presents the problem as her staff undermining her and being disrespectful, with Marles failing to fix it after she brought it to his attention. Instead, she got pushed out of the Oftice.
It’s not rare for a someone senior to act as gatekeeper, to deny junior staff access and to force staff to funnel their contributions through them.