These two consecutive Tests in India were rated below average and very good.
See if you can pick which is which and get your head around the ratings generally.
Seam movement is fine. Green top early and then if it starts to jag off the cracks as a game progresses, no problem. Part of the game. But the variable bounce - more so if some are rearing rather than some keeping low - is very problematic. The delivery in Perth that was reasonably full and still cleared the keeper rang warning bells and probably made rating the pitch pretty tricky.
Not as bad of course as This one at Sabina Park, which actually was abandoned after the England top-order was literally pummelled.
Dan Christian has to be one of the more underrated all rounders in T20 cricket, almost the perfect late overs batsman and a more than handy medium pacer with most of the tricks needed in the shortest form of the game.
That description from wimm wasn’t for the MCG pitch last year. Not sure which pitch it was describing though.
Imo, that MCG pitch should never have been rated poor. 70 overs for the match were lost to rain. It most likely would have been a cracking finish if not for the rain.
I’m not saying the MCG pitch was great.
But that it can have its international venue status put in jeopardy over it is a friggin’ joke.
And that it can be given three points out of a maximum five in four years over that match when Ranchi had first innings of 450 and 600 with 25 wickets lost in five full days and gets the top possible rating, then the rating system and the penalties are extremely broken.