Maybe the objective is for Ham to constantly have his tackles broken, fumble and turn the ball over by foot. This will provide us with a lot of practice defending turnovers and centre bounces from all the goals we concede and thus help us practice our team defence as well as improve at clearances.
This way, in 2070 we’ll finally be able to mount a challenge for the top 12.
If true then someone should tell Truck that having a decoy is like not tagging the oppo’s best ball getter. It ain’t working.
I think that might be a good observation, but I’d still prefer a more competitive option when it comes to a contest. And he doesn’t have enough credits in the bank to miss goals like he did in the last qtr. needs to do more than just run hard - reckon there are a few others that has the fitness to do that.
He’ll play well against Adelaide which generally the bottom 6 players do against poor opposition
It represents the single tear rolling down his check as he read his thread on blitz.
Lol.
You’d hope he has never read this thread.
if i was a player, id 100% have an account on here and troll you all
there are definitely players signed up on here
Killer Mike was probably Langfords alias.
I’m going to tell them I’m the next pendulbury and Parish is a bum. Haha fools.
I think he might go well if plays Left Right Out.
Think you are all being too harsh on Ham today he had way less turnovers and didn’t miss an easy goal
Can we finally drop this bloke once and for all? 7 possessions, 0 tackles. And Hobbs can’t get a game ahead of this cat? ■■■■ me dead.
He had 7 disposals, no tackles. That isn’t a good game.
Big liability. Even when he got near it he wasn’t clean or hesitated rather than make a gettable ball his.
He was terrible again. He must have an incriminating photo of Truck. The only reason I think we should play him is if we draft a bloke named Darren Eggs to play on the same line as him. Then redraft Josh Green and have a forward line of Green Eggs and Ham.
Otherwise delist.
DEVON SMITH had more touches and more impact in a half than Ham had in a full game. Why are we persisting with him. BRING. IN. HOBBS.
Prefer others.
The dropped mark in forward 50 was awful, so was the 8m pass to McGrath when ham could have run to 40 and had a shot.
He just doesn’t have “it”, and he’s reminding me more of Merrett by the day.
It’s worse than that. Of those 7 possessions, 6 of them whilst not clangers still ■■■■■■ up ball movement chains because he was too slow and hesitant to move the ball on.
I’ve defended him in past but he’s completely shot. VFL or the metaphorical bin.
But with Snelling done for another ~6 weeks he’ll likely be retained.