You are missing a few points of Hamas’s responsibilities which have made achieving those rules extremely difficult to almost impossible. Israel has made an effort on all those fronts. Could they have done more? Yes with more casualties to their soldiers. Should they have sacrificed their soldiers to reduce civilian casualties? If I was an Israeli or one of there leaders, I wouldn’t.
Is Israel being held to a different standard to other countries that have been attacked and retaliated in war? Definitely.
Please name me another time that in a war all those rules, including the rules you are not mentioning that Hamas hasn’t followed, or even tried to follow, have been met satisfactorily?
Allies in WW2 against the Nazis? Do you remember Dresden and the atomic bombs dropped on Japan? Any distinction, proportionality and precaution there?
Allies in Iraq? More than 500,000 dead with many of them civilians or soldiers that were forced to fight.
Vietnam? Nope given the carpet bombing.
Hamas shouldn’t have ■■■■■■ around and they wouldn’t have found out the repercussions of doing so.
They should have done what was in the best for their people. They didn’t. And now here we are.
Do you seriously believe there will be much of a Palestinian presence in Gaza? Its bad enough that the West Bank and Gaza are seperated by part of Israel. It’s like Brisbane and Melbourne being one country, but seperated by another country in Sydney. I suspect Israel will take over the Gaza strip.
Reviewing history and making odious comparisons doesn’t help 45000 dead Palestinians or their families. Facts are that Israel has been taking territory off Palestine for years with new settlements, assuming Hamas are the legitimate government in Palestine, then could you argue they are defending their land against aggressors ?
October 7 was an evil act, and perhaps Israel has some justification for retaliation but their response has been massively greater with 45000 deaths and total destruction.
The reason this topic has been banned in several threads is that many people have fixed opinions, and just keep arguing their own viewpoint.
On top of that, the Middle East conflicts have a long history, which keeps gets even more emotionally charged the further back you take it. There are so many wrongs on both sides over such a long period, that it becomes impossible to untangle who was at fault originally, and each side justifies current actions based on whichever wrongs against them that they choose from the past.
As for the question you posed, while striking first can be an effective military strategy, it’s hard to call that defence. And at the beginning of this particular conflict, Israel’s civilians were targeted, not their military. Can that be justified as defence? I’m sure some people will find a way to.
A Colombian lawmaker has been caught having a vape in parliament moments before she was called on to speak during a health reform debate.
Cathy Juvinao, a Congresswoman in the country’s capital, Bogotá, went viral this week after she was seen puffing on an e-cigarette when she thought no one was looking.
The camera was focused on House of Representatives President, Jaime Salamanca, but panned to Ms Juvinao who was inhaling on the yellow device.
When she realised she had been spotted, she quickly blew out the smoke and tucked the vape into her pocket away from the camera’s view.
Just moments later, Ms Juvinao, a member of the Green Alliance, was called to speak and grabbed the microphone to address her colleagues about the country’s health systems.