Debatable.
2 Likes
So he will resign after the game Sat night then…
1 Like
I think he’ll get sacked next year it’s how we operate we can’t stick to a plan
BORING
BORING
BRAD SCOTT
Having spent 30+ years wasting list spots on “the rubbish brother” (Shane Harvey, Marcus Pickett, Jackson Merrett, Shaun McKernan, Christian Bock etc.) I see we’ve now extended that philosophy to coaches…
Go us…
2 Likes
I mean, if he was to yolo any game…it would be this one.
Sack Brad.
He would walk away rather than suffering the indignity of being sacked. He would say no one in over 20 years could get this club to perform.
haha! 
Regardless of what selections we did this week the real value and test is going to be how they (Scott, assistants, footy admin and the board) assess what’s happened and what they do as a result of it.
Whatever we did this year / post-bye fell well short of being a competitive side - i.e. playing a full season.
You could add Mark McVeigh to that list if you wanted to.
He was very good but not as good as Jarrad.
Wouldn’t hold back imo he would air our dirty laundry and whack the club you then have farks like ■■■■ and Damo feasting on it
Fans got upset with Worstfolds’ parting comments reckon Brad would go harder
1 Like
Given that we’re out of finals contention Brad could have gone one of two ways - either play the kids or stick with the best 23. If we’d played the kids and lost by 80 points, there’s a nice easy excuse to hide behind. I think the coaching staff may have considered this, plus they won’t want to finish on a seriously low note again. We’ve got our best 23 playing, Brad has given them nothing to hide behind. If they get totally butt ■■■■■■ by the Lions there are no kids to point the finger at, no excuses at all. I like this. Gives added ammunition to show some of them the door.
3 Likes
That sounds pretty sensible.
Presumably the whole footy department can make merit based decisions without undue influence.
He finished his job at the AFL so they probably told us to take him
And our jellyfish spineless management probably agreed because they just love to bend over backwards to please the AFL
That’s why he’s called the plant
Well that’s my theory
Why else would you appoint the failed coach of North as your senior coach
I laugh when I read posts about how he’s going to build a premiership team when he left North in such a mess that they warrant priority picks
Now Carracella has left. He came from a successful club with a winning culture so of course that would clash with Scott’s philosophy of playing favourites each week regardless of form and leave young players languishing in the 2s
2 Likes
There’s already years of ammunition on some of their resumes, we don’t need one more dead rubber added to the ledger in order to kick them off the list
5 Likes
No doubt. He would go out of his way to protect his integrity.
1 Like
Which resumes in particular?
If it happen why would any aspiring coach would want to coach our rabble of a club when they see coaches continually get sacked every 3 years
Amazing