I don’t think these are great examples, and certainly are not Hurley like players. Kennedy was all potential at the time, if Carlton knew what he’d become, no way they do it.
I can’t speak for the Griffen one, he’s not the player he was, so I suspect Bulldogs knew what they were handing over.
I think somebody like a Kennedy could be included, but for us that would be Francis, and we could be making a huge mistake like farkcarlton
You have to factor in how the media works these days.
If Kelly leaves and nominates a club every football show, SEN, newspaper and associated pundit chimes in with their expert opinion on how much Kelly is worth and what it will take to get it done. The longer the trade drags out the bigger the circus becomes.
We all laugh at Hawthorns trading was last year to get value for O’Meara. But they had committed to him and were scrambling to come up with value to give to GC. They might have gone in with the view that they had secured the player and therefore had the upper hand but it didn’t play out that way.
Trading Kelly is like us trading Daniher, would you care about upper hand or b graders, we would demand the world for Daniher.
Kelly will stay, or choose a club.
The GWS will make a song and dance, and bend over and take whatever the receiving team feels it can afford… because that’s how these things work.
Agreed. I don’t think we have a player of any value that we’d be willing to give up. And if GWS are interested in players then I don’t think we’re in the equation.
… although thinking back I think they said the same thing for Treloar, and still took picks in the end
GWS drafted Sam Reid and Tendai fkg Mzungu, is there maybe just a chance that their list of 55 superstars is a touch overblown on here? This year it looks like Deledio, Griffen, Reid, Mzungu, Patfull, Tim Mohr and maybe Steve Johnson are cooked, and P Davis is always iffy. Hartley would be a useful get for them as would B Howlett as a defensive midfielder.