Port Review Thread


#182

Can’t disagree with that.

It’s a shame, because his gut-running was superb again. He was putting in big yards and getting to every possible contest.

But both his disposal and decision making were simply terrible.


#183

I thought he was running around lackadaisically on defence. seemed to be that kick whos ‘it’ in keep away games thats over it so just slowly jogging after the person with the ball.


#184

Imagine being the side that played Stringer into form


#185

When he said no originally did they really have to keep the camera on them for the next 30 seconds?

Let the poor bloke go and show something else.


#186

I can honestly say that I never at any stage this year thought we would lose this game.


#187

Re Hooker being on Watts, at the game you see how often the matchups change during play, depending where the ball is and whether you have a spare back. At various times we were swapping and changing to try to free up Hooker or Hurley, and Hooker was opposed to Watts at times, and Marshall at times, and a couple of times, even one of their smalls. It is a game of chess and not your traditional A played on B etc.


#188

Any rating that doesn’t give Hurley and Heppel big demerits for their disposal/decision making is ridiculous.


#189

Yep, Hooker was on Boak for a period of time.

Hartley on Dixon was probably the only real constant.


#190

Did give away 3 goals though…


#191

They’ve done it before, i believe its in extremely poor taste, you don’t pay money to watch the footy to be a spectacle for people at the game.


#192

Majority of the time I seen Hooker playing as the spareman. It was actually great to see his leadership down there. He was sorting out the defenders the whole match.

He’s such a natural with his reading of the play and intercept marking. It’s really valuable.

I don’t think Hurley has the string to his bow. He is more of the “follow me” leadership style.


#193

Yeah the champion data doesn’t give as much weighting to efficiency as super coach scoring does.

Hard to believe we’d ever see Myers as our most effective player.


#194

Zaka’s kicking has been poor all year. I remember commenting on how many times he failed to hit a target, or even kick to someone’s advantage, when streaming out of the middle in the last quarter of Rd 1. He misses targets way too often Heppell not far behind.
Our only real damaging ball user of our midfiielders is Zac. Goddard can be, but at times he turns it over.
Parish no, Smith the jury is still out for mine.


#195

True. He is capable of loads better. But: Todsy was his best game for the year (not saying much, I know) and is moving closer towards his best form. He was very involved today. A big step forward imo.


#196

I’ll have a spring in my step all week after that effort. I won’t the sorry sack of ■■■■ I’ve been.


#197

What is the difference between peer pressure and bullying again?


#198

Well, it was good to win, but it was as expected, a strong performance against a good team. Same as for most of the previous 15 years. So next week we should see another good effort (not necessarily a win).

However, the good thing is that players were played in their rightful position: Hooker, McGrath, Stringer, with JD having a run on the ball. The first two named stiffened up the back line, Stringer provides forward flare, and JD is freer when running around.

A thought about Daniher being below par: in the pre-season the emphasis with him was on improving his defensive play. When there is a change of focus, it usually takes time for the right balance to eventuate. But I often wonder if he has a bung leg, as I often see him limping.

Guelfi’s game suggests we have another midfielder. Nothing spectacular, but if he plays like that every week, he will be worth his place. And we can expect further improvement. Begley continues to improve, although still just worth a game. Fantasia is still running into form, as are Merrett and Myers. If the last named can have an injury free run, he might become an important player this year in the midfield.
Of course, this is a bit too much to expect, I fear.

How poor is the kicking of Heppell and Zaharakis, especially the latter. Neither of them have ever been as bad as this. Fortunately the latter’s handball was good.

I suppose the best thing, apart from the win, is knowing that they can play well this year. Now it’s up to how well they are primed each week. We need consistency from week in to week out. But I’m not optimistic that they will be any better in this department than for the past decade and a half.

ANZAC DAY, we can look forward to the game with some hope.


#199

Drink!


#200

Decent four quarter effort overall with patches of brilliance and bits of the exact opposite. Pressure was terrific today. Liked that although Port got a mini run-on at the end of the third, we didn’t let them get any significant momentum swing in their favour.

Only one game, but we may have unearthed a gem today in #35. Plenty to like.


#201

Quite apart from the win and the 2 out of 4 record and where we might finish, and all that…
From a medium to long term perspective, I am very pleased to see our midfield add Smith, and now Guelfi, with the attributes of hard nosed, pressure players, in the Sydney midfield mould (Parker, Jack, Hannebery). Let’s hope Clarke and Mynott continue with that, as it is something we have lacked since the days of JJ and Mark Johnson.