That’s just naive…they’re happy to live their privileged life in front of the media when all is going well…the flip side is that the media (rightly or wrongly) want access when things aren’t all rosy as well.
No it’s not. They told the public she was having a n op and would be available after Easter. Then the docs found something scary so they have been dealing with that in private. Nothing more was needed to be said other than what was already said.
We don’t even know when she was diagnosed with the cancer. It could have been 2 weeks ago. She was probably going to do her public stuff again if this hadn’t happened.
I don’t give a fark how famous she is, who she might or might not be, if she didn’t want to talk she didn’t have to. I also don’t care how they managed Charlie’s cancer announcement. Totally different scenario.
I’d like to live in your world of unicorns and Essendon winning finals. But in this world, right or wrong, more was obviously needed to avoid the internet stupidity.
Well this is the thing right. No, she didn’t have to say anything. There are consequences of that to someone in her position. That’s the life she’s entered into.
I’d kind of think it was the media feeding the internet trolls that was the problem. Media guessing what she had, trolls saying she was dead or murdered by Charles / William / American ■■■■■. That was all before the photo release.
Editing a photo is not a crime. Neither is asking for some privacy when dealing with a cancer diagnosis, even if you live a public life. . Yes, the public want to know the details but sometimes we just don’t deserve them. Leave her in peace. She’s going through a ■■■■ time.