That’s true but hopefully as a side benefit we will see some interesting stuff regarding the apportioning of blame.
Good. If they need embarrassing, embarrass them.
Are you saying that they shouldn’t have ‘moved on’, ‘put it all behind them’ and ‘made it their past, not their destiny’??
Are you trying to convince someone?
Tons of threads in the Blitz ocean - why lurk in here if it bothers you?
Try the DJ thread - everything is happy and fun in there.
Interesting that we now have proof of the umpires screwing us since the start of the supplements saga too.
The only year when we got given a break was when we have zero banned players on our list in 2016.
Nowadays, it’s not free differential that’s important, but where frees are given.
It was always thus.
I like coming home from work to good news.
Free kick tally’s are like trashy gossip magazine headlines - they don’t even go close to telling the real story.
Where, when and the number of frees not paid to us tell the real story.
Like the saga, the AFL have learned to manipulate the data by taking out the bits that are unfavourable to their story.
I suspect that the court case will also embarrass a few Essendon people - It won’t just be the AFL.
Most of us have only ever wanted the truth - warts and all.
Tania hasn’t signed any agreement to be gagged.
Also what doesn’t get picked up is when a free kick is paid and the team has already won the ball.
Most of us can handle the truth and if that happens we’ll accept it or I believe most will.
We’ve heard worse than the truth. So I don’t think there is any concerns.
What were we doing in 2003? -98!!
Saying that about free kick can tally’s - before I was wiser, I did do a count once and we were the only premiership team in recent history to have a negative differential in our premiership year.
I did notice last time I checked the AFL live stats, that frees for and against aren’t there.
Im pretty sure they were there a couple seasons ago.
Am I reading your table correctly in that Sydney and the Hawks have the worst +/-?
“But Justice John Dixon ruled the preliminary issues should not be heard separately and a full trial should proceed”.
Any date set?
Can this decision be appealed or is this final and the next step is to set a date?
Nothing’s in the Rage online version. Mustn’t be that bigger deal.
/sarcastica font