if you’re not going to be weary due to past mistakes re drafting, then surely you can’t then run with that trading in senior players is bad due to the mistakes of the same previous regime, either ?
the point the poster was making re the north situation is, high draft picks are generally used on midfielders, they are generally the ones who get the ball and stand out.
If you’re going best available for your needs, then you don’t necessarily need high draft picks, cos again they will be taken up with mids.
what we desperately need is for whatever path they choose to go down, they nail it.
I think cox and jones are delist decisions. They aren’t trade worthy. It’s either sign again or delist, and I can’t read what happens to either of them right now.
I would suggest this new administration is probably more cut throat than previous iterations, both could be moved forward n if they don’t lift their game.
When you have a list managed who constantly tries to burn everyone it’s always going to blow back in your face. Any other club but us and he gets traded no issues
Can argue dodoros past reputation all you want, but not on this one, it was well documented they kept increasing what they wanted and their demands were ridiculous come their last request
Because they never had any interest in dealing with us due to the feud with Dodoro.
I mentioned around about trade time that one of the player agents I spoke to said that the Dogs had zero intention of trading with us due to the issue and no matter what we offered was never going to be enough. They purposely changed the goalposts on us and he absolutely maintains that of another club had offered similar to us than Dunkley would’ve been traded
Not saying this is one of them, but there seems to be several myths that are taken as gospel here, despite them having no basis outside of Blitz.
Obviously there are certain posted who do have solid info, so sometimes they are accurate. @Aceman seems to be one of them, and he suggests Dogs were toying with us