I was more trying to suggest that the two specifically mentioned have been mentioned because they are indeed two of the worst. I would indeed like to believe that everything is even and our umpires are evenly poor, but I do not.
As you indicate, the overall poor umpiring interpretations are pretty much due to the rules being as grey as can be.
It makes me think of the HTB rule. Once it meant, if you had prior opportunity and the ball was not disposed of correctly, then you were pinged for HTB. Now however, oin order to make the game “flow” more, if you are HTB yet it gets “knocked out in the tackle” then they call play on. The problem is though, not many actually get knocked out, most are simply dropped but unless it is so bleedingly obvious they won’t pay (who am I kidding, even when obvious) against it. Now players don’t even try to dispose of it, they just let go.
One thing I’ve increasingly noticed is how even with three umps they love to all stay middle of the ground. So players can and do happily drop the ball when facing the crowd, because they know they’ll almost never get pinged for it.
Biggest mistake was introducing 2 umpires to the original central umpire. The game is now massively over umpired and like DJR said, from the middle of the ground.
The obvious solution was to keep one central umpire and instead added two more boundary umpires. Give the boundary umpires the ability to call obvious frees (only) but let the central umpire to actually umpire a free flowing game.
With 4 boundary umpires, you’ll never have these clowns out of position, no angles are blinded and real decisions, not guess work, can be made.
Still puzzled as to how Parnell could hear booing when unconscious?
Anyway the traditional Windy Hill response was not to boo an fallen umpire or opposition player but to call loudly for the “Screen!”
Much more civilised.